FINALLY! Ever since Jon and I created fiftyfifty.me, a reading/movie challenge, go figure that we got so busy administrating that we haven't gotten a moment to read. And by "we", I mean the royal We here.
The good news is that I just turned the last page of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie.
Book #1, done!
The bad news: only giving it 2 of 5 stars. This means "eh".
I have loved other Agatha Christie mysteries but this wasn't a favorite. Too many moving pieces, to begin with. I kept flipping forward to refer to the cast of characters; only a few stood out to me and to the very end I couldn't really tell the butler from the secretary, for example. It barreled forward throwing in details out of left field. Somehow it skidded to a halt that was completely predictable but based on nothing I could have predicted. Sounds odd to say, but if you read it you'll immediately know what I mean.
I spent more of the time being confounded and retracing my steps/trying to visualize what was going on than getting to sink into the story or even have a hope of getting my own guesses going. That said, I enjoyed her writing along the way, even in my complete confusion.
The book setup calls to mind ever-beloved Clue; a mansion, a muuuuuurder, and maps of the layout that you have to ponder over. However, in the end it just didn't deliver for me. That said, I believe the book is famous for introducing certain writing devices into mystery. Click here if (and ONLY if) you want a spoiler, ok?
Hercule Poirot is a memorable literary character with a pretty awesome name, but I'll stick to the film/tv versions of his subset of Christie tales if they're all like this.
Will definitely be reading other Agatha Christies for the challenge, I'm sure, but this wasn't the running start I was hoping for! Oh well, I suppose it sets the bar low- my next 49 books better deliver or else.
The good news is that I just turned the last page of The Murder of Roger Ackroyd by Agatha Christie.
Book #1, done!
The bad news: only giving it 2 of 5 stars. This means "eh".
I have loved other Agatha Christie mysteries but this wasn't a favorite. Too many moving pieces, to begin with. I kept flipping forward to refer to the cast of characters; only a few stood out to me and to the very end I couldn't really tell the butler from the secretary, for example. It barreled forward throwing in details out of left field. Somehow it skidded to a halt that was completely predictable but based on nothing I could have predicted. Sounds odd to say, but if you read it you'll immediately know what I mean.
I spent more of the time being confounded and retracing my steps/trying to visualize what was going on than getting to sink into the story or even have a hope of getting my own guesses going. That said, I enjoyed her writing along the way, even in my complete confusion.
The book setup calls to mind ever-beloved Clue; a mansion, a muuuuuurder, and maps of the layout that you have to ponder over. However, in the end it just didn't deliver for me. That said, I believe the book is famous for introducing certain writing devices into mystery. Click here if (and ONLY if) you want a spoiler, ok?
Hercule Poirot is a memorable literary character with a pretty awesome name, but I'll stick to the film/tv versions of his subset of Christie tales if they're all like this.
Will definitely be reading other Agatha Christies for the challenge, I'm sure, but this wasn't the running start I was hoping for! Oh well, I suppose it sets the bar low- my next 49 books better deliver or else.
0 comments:
Post a Comment